Skip to content

Conversation

aDotInTheVoid
Copy link
Member

Follow up to #109410, CC @fmease

r? @GuillaumeGomez

@rustbot rustbot added A-rustdoc-json Area: Rustdoc JSON backend S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels May 13, 2023
@fmease
Copy link
Member

fmease commented May 13, 2023

Thanks! :)

@GuillaumeGomez
Copy link
Member

Thanks!

@bors r=fmease,GuillaumeGomez rollup

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented May 13, 2023

📌 Commit c271c70 has been approved by fmease,GuillaumeGomez

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels May 13, 2023
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request May 14, 2023
…iaskrgr

Rollup of 4 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#111463 (Better diagnostics for `env!` where variable contains escape)
 - rust-lang#111477 (better diagnostics for `impl<..> impl Trait for Type`)
 - rust-lang#111534 (rustdoc-json: Add tests for `#![feature(inherent_associated_types)]`)
 - rust-lang#111549 ([rustdoc] Convert more GUI tests colors to their original format)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 70ab314 into rust-lang:master May 14, 2023
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.71.0 milestone May 14, 2023
@aDotInTheVoid aDotInTheVoid deleted the ita-rdj branch May 14, 2023 15:27
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A-rustdoc-json Area: Rustdoc JSON backend S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants